That's called Aussie Style. It's much more fun, and in my opinion you have more control.The forward run down face first was cool!
I was really surprised I didn’t get a better shave. I know you told me it was aggressive, but the way Chad talked about how smooth and efficient it was, I expected better.Nice video KJ. Wow, I expected you to perhaps not like the blade feel since you prefer milder razors,but have to say I'm shocked you didn't feel more efficiency (NO better then the Rockwell) I am more careful with the Timeless with the blade feel but it's light-years ahead for a closer shave for me. That being said, it is what it is for you and I always appreciate you doing honest reviews of how it feels to you. Thanks.
Only way to get a smoother Timeless is to get a straight bar with the .68 gap at least with the stainless models.
Your Mileage May Vary!Thanks for the road test with that one. Saved me some heart ache, or at least some razor burn.
Posted from work computer, not my phone. I work in a secure area, no phones allowed.KJ posts videos from his phone = KJ has his phone with him = KJ makes us wait for the next shaving video??
Thanks for stealing my thunder, Don!It looks like the Rockwell plate 5 is a .69 mm gap. Plate 4 is .61 mm and the plate 6 is .79.
It looks like the .68 Timeless plate is the mildest plate they have.
Great video! Like Dave said...appreciate your honest reviews.
By the way...I love the new sound effects!
Thanks for stealing my thunder, Don!
OC or Closed?So I have shaved with both the .68 Timeless and the .95. I remember the .95 being way too harsh for me. But I had a real nice shave with the .68...hmm, maybe it was just dumb luck. Anyway...it's very interesting.
OC or Closed?