Spring Drive is sweet and there were several I thought I wanted just as much as the Aqua Terra I'm looking at. Until I went and saw them in person. Most of them were Zzzzzz.I am a huge Omega fan, but the Grand Seiko Spring Drive eats its lunch!
Spring Drive is sweet and there were several I thought I wanted just as much as the Aqua Terra I'm looking at. Until I went and saw them in person. Most of them were Zzzzzz.I am a huge Omega fan, but the Grand Seiko Spring Drive eats its lunch!
What’s that in CHF?FYI, $300 off any watch at Crown & Caliber this weekend with MDW300
Anyone?Any chance the Timex is at least worth what I paid for it?
I agree the movement is a nice hybrid of almost “accutron” like movement and automatic works, however the overall fit and finish is typical Seiko, which is nice, but imho does not justify the Grand Seiko prices and to echo what Dave mentioned, esthetically they are just mediocre to meI am a huge Omega fan, but the Grand Seiko Spring Drive eats its lunch!
Sorry, I only know what looks pretty. As you can tell from most of my videosAnyone?
Well, it ain’t no Big Boy.Anyone?
They aren't the sexy beasts that say, a Planet Ocean chronograph or GMT, might be, but their build and accuracy are very fair in that price point.but imho does not justify the Grand Seiko prices and to echo what Dave mentioned, esthetically they are just mediocre to me
Don’t misunderstand I am not saying they are a bad watch, quite the opposite , however this illustrates my point that esthetically, they are just not quite there for me, now the Seiko diver line is, to me where Seiko really sets the bar. In fact the Monster is a perfect example, and to be honest the hybridization of a quartz movement and a rotor to power it is not a new concept. It have more Selina has one as well, but in the end it is a quartz watch, which is ok, but to me, again other than the divers, I grew up when you could buy Seiko at almost any retailer such as Sears, Kmart, etc. in fact in the 80’s everyone had a Seiko. I know it is not the same company as those days, I just do not see the designs that appeal to me personally.They aren't the sexy beasts that say, a Planet Ocean chronograph or GMT, might be, but their build and accuracy are very fair in that price point.
Some comparative evidence.
![]()
![]()
All I am hearing is you should just get more watches. See I'm helpingnow the Seiko diver line is, to me where Seiko really sets the bar. In fact the Monster is a perfect example
Don’t misunderstand I am not saying they are a bad watch, quite the opposite , however this illustrates my point that esthetically, they are just not quite there for me, now the Seiko diver line is, to me where Seiko really sets the bar. In fact the Monster is a perfect example, and to be honest the hybridization of a quartz movement and a rotor to power it is not a new concept. It have more Selina has one as well, but in the end it is a quartz watch, which is ok, but to me, again other than the divers, I grew up when you could buy Seiko at almost any retailer such as Sears, Kmart, etc. in fact in the 80’s everyone had a Seiko. I know it is not the same company as those days, I just do not see the designs that appeal to me personally.
But of course! Also love the sly sneaky peak of that Opus X in that pic.You do know you are already an agent for the CEC right?
Wow, your Dad had fantastic taste in watches! Too bad that one didn't remain in the family.@wristwatchb my father-in-law wore an 18k 1953 Patek to my wedding. Stunning in its simplicity and heritage. He ultimately sold it, which made me sad. For me a pie-pan Constellation on a beads of rice band, is the pinnacle dress watch.
![]()
Mine doesn't wear a watch often, but we have his/hers 60s vintage Omega's with hers being a Ladymatic with a date complication.My Bride tried on a lady's SS/18K Constellation many years ago just for fun (that's how things start),