TobyC
"I shaved a Tribble once..."
Blasphemy!You should be very afraid my friend! I think you get me! Whoa.... You need to see a Specialist!
The book of Armaments is a sacred tome of knowledge!!!
Arm thyself, and thou shalt be free!
Blasphemy!You should be very afraid my friend! I think you get me! Whoa.... You need to see a Specialist!
Me and my lovely bride were just talking about this. I can't so much more because it gets into politics out west, mostly.Blasphemy!
The book of Armaments is a sacred tome of knowledge!!!
Arm thyself, and thou shalt be free!
But only with the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch.Blasphemy!
The book of Armaments is a sacred tome of knowledge!!!
Arm thyself, and thou shalt be free!
Let us not forget about the feastingBlasphemy!
The book of Armaments is a sacred tome of knowledge!!!
Arm thyself, and thou shalt be free!
“And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high, saying, ‘O Lord, bless this thy hand grenade, that with it thou mayst blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy.’ And the Lord did grin. And the people did feast upon the lambs and sloths, and carp and anchovies, and orangutans and breakfast cereals, and fruit-bats. And the Lord spake, saying, ‘First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin. Then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who, being naughty in my sight, shall snuff it.'”Let us not forget about the feasting
Very interesting article!Apologies if this has already been posted. I found it very interesting, Thought some of you might as well.
![]()
A Supercomputer Analyzed Covid-19 — and an Interesting New Theory Has Emerged
A closer look at the Bradykinin hypothesiselemental.medium.com
I'm a nurse, and I have to say that the author of the piece did a GREAT job of making that understandable. I just couldn't figure out how the toes were being affected by this virus.Apologies if this has already been posted. I found it very interesting, Thought some of you might as well.
![]()
A Supercomputer Analyzed Covid-19 — and an Interesting New Theory Has Emerged
A closer look at the Bradykinin hypothesiselemental.medium.com
Science is understanding how everything works, the quest for knowledge, which is always good. The problem is when fake science is created purely for political purposes.I'm a nurse, and I have to say that the author of the piece did a GREAT job of making that understandable. I just couldn't figure out how the toes were being affected by this virus.
If this hypothesis proves to be fact it should REALLY help with a possible vaccine. Thanks for sharing it. I posted it to FakeBook, I'm sure some of my friends who don't agree with me politically will either not read it or just dismiss it. We've just become SO GOOD at being dismissive lately. Like science can't be legitimate if you vote a certain way! (Sorry, end of rant.)
It did a great job of explaining the pathology. I'd never read a lot of that stuff, and definitely nothing so concise.eLife, the journal where that paper was published is very high quality. It doesn’t publish junk.
Science is also about not becoming so emotionally invested in an idea or ideology you fail to acknowledge when the data no longer supports it. What may have been science “fact” yesterday can be declared absolutely wrong today ...and a scientist will celebrate the discovery that caused yesterday’s fact to become wrong.Science is understanding how everything works, the quest for knowledge, which is always good. The problem is when fake science is created purely for political purposes.
Science = good
Politicians = seldom worthy of trust
Science is also about not becoming so emotionally invested in an idea or ideology you fail to acknowledge when the data no longer supports it. What may have been science “fact” yesterday can be declared absolutely wrong today ...and a scientist will celebrate the discovery that caused yesterday’s fact to become wrong.
Science is not proud or stubborn.
FUNDING. too often fact and funding are too closely interdependent.I trained as a scientist, and would quibble with that a bit. The fields are as captive to egos and agendas as other careers, and if big name people dig in, it can take awhile for facts to win out. Since they are empirical, facts usually do win.