The type of air tight research I have come to expect from the medical community.
I work with data. We can use it to tell any story we want toThe type of air tight research I have come to expect from the medical community.
I would point out that wasn't texting AND driving. More driving INTO texting. Your argument is judged invalid.After a car ran into a telegraph pole.....
Now do baby car hammock fatalities.
Reeks of false equivalence, agreed.I would point out that wasn't texting AND driving. More driving INTO texting. Your argument is judged invalid.
Point of order !! It did state Texting And Driving fatalities so it could be read as fatalities while texting and fatalities while driving so the numbers you stated would be completely Wrong... As I am sure there were more driving fatalities in the 1960's than 0 !!I would point out that wasn't texting AND driving. More driving INTO texting. Your argument is judged invalid.