The Shaving Cadre

Welcome to The Shaving Cadre, a forum dedicated to gentlemanly discourse about wet shaving and other topics of common interests. Membership is always free so register today and join in the fun

Josh's Olfactory Office

Interesting. Chaps was the first frag I ever had; it was gifted to me as a freshman or sophomore in High School (91/93 time frame). At the time, Davidoff's Cool Water and Drakkar Noir were the undisputed kings of the designer frags, at least at my school. I wore it sparingly, (it was also in splash form, no atomizer), when I even remembered to apply it. I never really got another frag until I bought a bottle of Drakkar Noir, Joop! and Davidoff Farenheit post-graduation (1995). Chaps remains a very nostalgic scent for me, however. Not good, not bad, just nostalgic.
So you know what's funny? I don't like Cool Water or Drakkar Noir. With Cool Water I have reverse nostalgia because my father wore it. As for Drakkar, I just can't click with it. It has something in it that doesn't connect. It might be the Citrus but in the back there's a rough, old man musk in the back that turns me off. But I do like it on SOME people.
 
I didn't know any better at the time...true lemming behavior from me. Other people were buying them, I have to buy them. I didn't know anything about top, middle/heart and base notes. I just knew that they were popular scents, lol. If I new then what I know now, I would have just sprung for one of the high dollar Italian, English or French niche frags. Creed released Millesime Imperiale and Silver Mountain Water that year. I would also throw in Acqua di Parma Colonia, but I grew up in a very Italian part of the country and that was already a very popular scent and carried very specific connotations.
 
I didn't know any better at the time...true lemming behavior from me. Other people were buying them, I have to buy them. I didn't know anything about top, middle/heart and base notes. I just knew that they were popular scents, lol. If I new then what I know now, I would have just sprung for one of the high dollar Italian, English or French niche frags. Creed released Millesime Imperiale and Silver Mountain Water that year. I would also throw in Acqua di Parma Colonia, but I grew up in a very Italian part of the country and that was already a very popular scent and carried very specific connotations.
I can only imagine. Was stuff like Acqua di Selva big in your area?
 
or Drakkar Noir. With Cool Water I have reverse nostalgia because my father wore it. As for Drakkar, I just can't click with it. It has something in it that doesn't connect.
Similar with Drakkar. I recall it being commonly used in my youth, and I picked some up later in life and couldn’t connect with it. That’s was a while ago, so I don’t exactly remember why.
 
Similar with Drakkar. I recall it being commonly used in my youth, and I picked some up later in life and couldn’t connect with it. That’s was a while ago, so I don’t exactly remember why.
Man, speaking of, I would do crazy things to get a decent condition bottle of original 1972 Drakkar. Current prices are outrageous and sampling is impossible given how long it's been discontinued. I've smelled Drakkar Noir so damn much even today. It's not a bad smell, do NOT get me wrong, I don't hate it, it's just my own chemistry and perception. In the air it's a pleasant enough citrus musk, on other people it gives the air of a confident, nonchalant guy. On me? It's all purpose cleaner and wet dog.
 
And speaking of Drakkar, I have smelled Drakkar Noir but won't review it. Everyone here has smelled it and knows what to think about it. However, I AM interested in reviewing Guy Laroches other fragrances. In fact, I have recently gotten ahold of all of them except the OG Drakkar. No exaggeration! For really good prices and deals, GL Horizon, Drakkar Essence, and Dynamik are coming in soon, and Drakkar Bleu and Intense I have on hand but they're brand new and being given to my step father as gifts (he likes old school stuff given his age and he loves the bottle of Noir I gave him so I wanted to follow up with the flankers so he had some diversity.)

To tack on, I won't review anything I don't own or have a readily available sample to smell for review accuracy. Just because I've had it doesn't mean I can dredge up my feelings and perception in the moment, like the mental thought bubble can't form without substance, you know. Plenty more reviews to come, even working on one right now!
 
1000001313.jpg
Review No. 5: Paul Sebastian Fine Cologne for Men

And I'm back with another review, and on a new fragrance to my collection. I just got it today at CVS for less than 4 bucks. WITH tax! This here is a very old school sorta fragrance from 1979. In all honesty, without any breakdown, this is a very old, classy scent, full of age and history, but it is defintely "of it's time", not that that is an issue, but it is something to point out.

So how this one came to be was that apparently, it was found all over the place in several stores, like your usual drug stores and such, and was also apart of the trend of being a free gift with some purchases... This is reminiscent of when Geoffrey Beene and fashion designer labels did this in malls and such. How nostalgic! I mean, even the bottle, it's so classic and simple, it's cute.

Now my review is going to be a little short as I haven't much to say that will be full of substance or crazy to say.
The Scent: To be blunt, it smells old and very of it's time, It shares a DNA with other fragrances of it's time or smells like something else in a way. In fact, it almost exactly smells like British Sterling. So the top starts off odd with this weird chemical-like smell before giving way to a very, very heavy top with powdery nutmeg and lavender, with the other top note of clary sage not really making any pressence, unless it's the note thats amplifying the nutmeg. There's also some mild spices, clove, and sweet musk that bleeds in frm the middle and base. All this for approximately 10 minutes or less before the florals kick in, and the florals are heavy in the middle. The middle start off with a long, heavy Rose lead, with a touch of sweetness from Jasmine and a strange sweet dirtiness that might be coming off from the ylang ylang. It has this sorta sweet sweat smell, possibly due to the musk ramping up and connecting with the ylang ylang. It's not awful, but not what one may want to project, especially on a hot day. Eventually this ends on a very artifical Oakmoss and sweet ambery musk, with the patchouli being mostly absent. It might have blended in with the sweetness but I came expecting an earthier touch. I can catch it in the beginning of a sniff before it just vanishes... Disappointing. I love patchouli.

So overall, it isn't a bad scent, it just smells and feels old. It is classy, maybe a little refined, it is different, but it's just old. The florals here don't do it for me, and it smelling like British Sterling just doesn't do it for me. It's strange given that other things like Givenchy Gentleman and Marbert Man had come out a few years earlier, and yet still smell as timeless as ever, while giving the sophisticated presence much more effectively. I don't hate this scent, but I can't see myself ever wearing it, especially as I have better choices in my arsenal. I could see older women, though, liking and perhaps even being able to pull this off. If you smell it at the right angle you can also oddly get instances of Dana Canoe, and even CK Obsession. I'm not saying this smells like either, but at the right moment of smelling you can get hints of them.
 
Man, speaking of, I would do crazy things to get a decent condition bottle of original 1972 Drakkar. Current prices are outrageous and sampling is impossible given how long it's been discontinued. I've smelled Drakkar Noir so damn much even today. It's not a bad smell, do NOT get me wrong, I don't hate it, it's just my own chemistry and perception. In the air it's a pleasant enough citrus musk, on other people it gives the air of a confident, nonchalant guy. On me? It's all purpose cleaner and wet dog.
I wore it in the 1980s. Loved it. A true babe magnet. 😇
 
View attachment 152820
Review No. 5: Paul Sebastian Fine Cologne for Men

And I'm back with another review, and on a new fragrance to my collection. I just got it today at CVS for less than 4 bucks. WITH tax! This here is a very old school sorta fragrance from 1979. In all honesty, without any breakdown, this is a very old, classy scent, full of age and history, but it is defintely "of it's time", not that that is an issue, but it is something to point out.

So how this one came to be was that apparently, it was found all over the place in several stores, like your usual drug stores and such, and was also apart of the trend of being a free gift with some purchases... This is reminiscent of when Geoffrey Beene and fashion designer labels did this in malls and such. How nostalgic! I mean, even the bottle, it's so classic and simple, it's cute.

Now my review is going to be a little short as I haven't much to say that will be full of substance or crazy to say.
The Scent: To be blunt, it smells old and very of it's time, It shares a DNA with other fragrances of it's time or smells like something else in a way. In fact, it almost exactly smells like British Sterling. So the top starts off odd with this weird chemical-like smell before giving way to a very, very heavy top with powdery nutmeg and lavender, with the other top note of clary sage not really making any pressence, unless it's the note thats amplifying the nutmeg. There's also some mild spices, clove, and sweet musk that bleeds in frm the middle and base. All this for approximately 10 minutes or less before the florals kick in, and the florals are heavy in the middle. The middle start off with a long, heavy Rose lead, with a touch of sweetness from Jasmine and a strange sweet dirtiness that might be coming off from the ylang ylang. It has this sorta sweet sweat smell, possibly due to the musk ramping up and connecting with the ylang ylang. It's not awful, but not what one may want to project, especially on a hot day. Eventually this ends on a very artifical Oakmoss and sweet ambery musk, with the patchouli being mostly absent. It might have blended in with the sweetness but I came expecting an earthier touch. I can catch it in the beginning of a sniff before it just vanishes... Disappointing. I love patchouli.

So overall, it isn't a bad scent, it just smells and feels old. It is classy, maybe a little refined, it is different, but it's just old. The florals here don't do it for me, and it smelling like British Sterling just doesn't do it for me. It's strange given that other things like Givenchy Gentleman and Marbert Man had come out a few years earlier, and yet still smell as timeless as ever, while giving the sophisticated presence much more effectively. I don't hate this scent, but I can't see myself ever wearing it, especially as I have better choices in my arsenal. I could see older women, though, liking and perhaps even being able to pull this off. If you smell it at the right angle you can also oddly get instances of Dana Canoe, and even CK Obsession. I'm not saying this smells like either, but at the right moment of smelling you can get hints of them.
Classic! Always loved the Art Deco bottle design.
 
The reviews will continue soon, I've just been busy as all get out, with work and the holidays. Tonight or tomorrow I'll drop some in, and I'm feeling like rolling out the Geoffrey Beene trilogy... That's right, I even have Bowling Green.
 
Hey! I'm back! let's get right to it!

1000001319.jpg
Review No. 6: Grey Flannel by Geoffrey Beene (The EA formulation)

A little late to this one, but as promised I would roll out the Geoffrey Beene trilogy. Starting with the first, we enter Grey Flannel, originally made in 1975 under I believe French fragrances, then Miami later on, before EA took over, so my version and how I perceive it will be different than a lot of the older members here. So... Before the real review comes in, this is a very, very different fragrance. It's dark, challenging, and at best, somber. Looking at the bottle and presentation alone, it's very... Bleak. It's a tall, dark, murky glass with no fancy shape or emblems, just a label slapped on crookedly like someone just sighed and said "good enough". Interestingly, Geoffrey Beene originally made fashion for women, and notably the fragrances released for women were much more playful and had striking bottles, whilst everything made for men was... Simple, straightforward, minimalistic, and there's something appealing about that. I do know this originally came in a flannel sack, which I would like to have so I can toss this box out, but it now is sorta apart of the character to this fragrances with the total bleak minimalism.

So let's discuss this scent, and I'll walk you through the feelings it presents to me, to paint a picture if you somehow have never smelled it before. I'll try to be concise with the notes but... Well, it's a fragrance from the 70s dang it, it's got 17 notes that can't be picked out!!

The scent: A term I often use for this is it's... Dark. This has a gothic appeal as it's not something you wear in happiness. It has a real grey skies and melancholic mood attached to it's approach, I'd imagine this being worn by Dr. Frankenstein himself, if you've read the novel you'd understand perfectly. If not? Pretend the movie doesn't exist. The book is oozing with sophistication and deep depression over a helping of tragedy. Upon the opening, there is a sharp opening of bitter, realistic greens and bitter, powdery citrus. It starts with Galbanum, Petitgrain, Neroli, Bergamot, and Lemon. You are hit with the Neroli and Petigrain immediately with a sort of choking fog of galbanum, where soon the powdery-musky bergamot rind comes in before settling on a earthy lemon pith (the white stuff under the rind, or skin). The mental image I can best describe the feeling is of the Sun's brightness being smothered by a dark, cloudy, overcast day that won't let up. It won't rain, but the wind is erratic at times and there may be small rumblings of thunder. The heart of this fragrance is a long ride of pure, total florals. It's Violet, Iris, Galbanum, Mimosa, Narcissus, Sage, and Rose. This is deeply lead by a dark, musk drenched, masculine Violet and is backed up with touches of Iris and Geranium, but not soapy geranium you might recognize, instead it's a harsh and earthy geranium with a watery Iris... It honestly reminds me of an old, used sponge in a way. I can't detect any rose, sage, narcissus, or mimosa, but perhaps they bled into the middle as a whole. This part smells like the sky finally broke and began raining, and you're now trudging through a muddy, stomped out field of violets while holding a ruined bouquet of flowers meant for a loved one. This ends on a dark mixture of oakmoss, vetiver, cedar, tonka bean, and almond. The oakmoss is certainly present with a bitter-sour greenness, with a touch of tonka spice underneath giving a scratch to the nostrils. I don't detect the vetiver, as there is no smokiness, but there is earhtiness for sure. Now the odd part is the cedar and almond, or lack thereof. I can't detect any woodiness, and almonds don't really have a scent to detect, but if you heat this up, maybe with being in sunlight or exhaling heat from your nose you can pick up an odd hint of an off putting underlying sweetness, possibly an effect of the almond. This ends with the arrival to this loved one's grave that is visited annually. The scent's of outside mixing with the remnant scent of their brooch you keep close. Was it lilac, or rose? You can't remember, nor do you want to.

This is a dark, masculine, and brooding floral scent with no sweetness. It's bitter, musky, earthy, and hard to approach. It smells like something worn through a dark period, perhaps funerals... It's not uplifting or inviting, it just smells like "go away, and leave me be" if it needed a scent to match an appearance. This is best worn in Autumn and early Winter, but certainly never Summer. You might get away with it in Spring as a good contract against the bright and colorful blooms of spring, to say even while the world is jubilant, your heart is far from it.

I happen to love this scent, despite not wearing it often. It doesn't smell like anything you have ever smelled or even own. It's challenging and is totally opposite to my true taste and Personality, and it helps I am a Violet enjoyer. It's a scent I can only wear in odd times and scenarios, and while it's away my heart grows fond. When I first wore it about 2 years ago I could not tolerate it, but now I simply appreciate it for what it is. If you enjoy the dark, macabre, and maybe even Noir, this is all that and more.
 
1000001318.jpg
Review No. 7: Bowling Green by Geoffrey Beene (EA Formulation)

STOP! Nope, uh uh. This is NOT in reference to modern "Bowling", this is in reference to "Bowls", which is a sport that was often played in England by nobility and the wealthy. It's played sorta like the old game of marbles, where you try to roll odd shaped balls into a ring of smaller circles. It's simple and complicated at the same time, and I don't want to sit here telling someone how to play a game that I myself don't know how to play and have never played. The "Bowling Green" refers to the glass fields that the game is played on. So have these things in mind: a sport played on a freshly cut grass field by wealthy, preppy people. Also, this is my favorite of the three Beene fragrances for men, but it's also the most expensive as it was discontinued and the price was jacked way up.

The Scent: Starting us off is a blast of clean, refreshing green and citrus spices. Oh, and guess what? This is the dang 80's so theres a 100 notes going on. This starts on lemon, bergamot, cloves, orange, juniper berries, basil, vetiver, and "fruity notes". What you'll immediately get is the clove and basil and the citrus combined underneath, which then leads into a heavy mix of bittersweet juniper and vetiver, with the fruity notes somewhere underneath. This is instantly uplifting, bright, and fresh. It smells like how a fresh shave on a beautiful spring day feels. Next we lead into the middle, a MOUTHFUL of notes, that being lemon verbena, lavender, oakmoss, pine needles, nutmeg, sage, artemesia, cardamom, cinnamon, and jasmine. I will say that this is totally led by the lemon verbena and lavender, with whiffs of pine underneath. There isn't much spice here in the middle that can be picked apart, but they combine to make an approachable "allspice" in a way. This is a very nice, aromatic, semisweet middle with a kick. It's very smooth and green, mature and assured. It reminds me of a nice, freshly cleaned combo of slacks and a vest. The base of it all ends with more oakmoss, fir, geranium, rosemary, coriander, sandalwood, patchouli, cedar, amber, and brazilian rosewood. The end of this fragrance is rather underwhelming simple as there's so much going on, it all blends without much differentiation. It's a sweet and woody end, you can get the amber and sandalwood with cedar mixed in, maybe the brazilian rosewood also, some touches of a bitter-sour fir, and some patchouli sweet earthiness... And that's it. That's me really huffing my wrist, mind you. It's a complicated but pleasant blend at the end.

Truly, I love this scent. It's effortlessly clean and yet, elegant in a sense. It evokes a beautiful, bright, and clear spring day, and that's all I can say. It's approachable and pleasant. It has a shaving creaminess to it also. One weakness it has is getting compared to or referenced to other fragrances, but that's what also makes it somewhat unique. It can this effect of "you can't put your finger on it". I think any man can pull this off, and you can wear it in spring and cool summer days.
 
1000001320.jpg
Review No. 8: Eau De Grey Flannel by Geoffrey Beene (EA Formulation)

Next is the third and final fragrance to come from the Beene brand, released in 1997. By name it's technically a flanker, but this smells so different it could be it's own fragrance. Where Grey Flannel is a dark, brooding scent, this is a brighter, much more preppy scent. As you can see, I've put quite a dent in this bottle, but that's also because I've had it a good while. I won't say it's my favorite, but it's such an easy wear for most situations you can come up with, like work, play, school, church, etc. It's versatile and approachable. What strikes me odd is how this came to be. It's the 90s, but Beene was already lowering in status, and by this point, sweet yet sharp fragrances were hitting the market, so why would they go in this route of a woody fougere? Anyway.

Here's the Scent: A very simple, clean, aromatic opening which features cypress, lemon, mandarin, cedar, star anise, and caraway. Immediately, a blast of star anise and cypress burst out with a sharp, clean opening that leads into a caraway and cedar head. Interestingly, the citrus isn't too potent in this scent, it moreso smells like the acidic oil from the skin of the peel, but not citric in nature. It's an interesting take on a freshie, very "out the shower" in it's most basic description. This goes into a middle of lavender, eucalyptus, clary sage, and patchouli. Admittedly, this is very eucalyptus and lavender forward, but it's not heavy on the eucalyptus. It's a minty, green, nose opening take instead of the medicinal cough drop eucalyptus you may expect. The lavender here is sweet and herbal, and there's a powdery layer of sage and sweet herbal patchouli. It's a very calming and seld assured middle, a total mood booster by this point. And we end on a simple trio of sandalwood, musk, and vetiver. The woodiness here is sorta muted, the sandalwood is quiet, yet the musk and vetiver shine. The musk is a white, floral musk, very clean and simple that blends into a smoky sweet vetiver. As the mid lowers into the base it gives a sorta warmth as well, a very pleasant and inviting warm woodiness.

This fragrance is not bad at all. It's cheap and easy to wear, but it's not too mass appealing either. It's a very reassuring, uplifting scent that wakes you up and cam lift your mood. I see this worn on warm spring-autumn days, and some cool summer days as well, but it will be impossible to notice in winter. This can be worn practically anywhere at any time, and without any particular dress code. This would make an excellent aftershave, or even a good pair for Aqua Velva.

BONUS: I do also have a small 2oz vintage bottle from the French era. Notably: I hate it! This starts very much the same, maybe with some more detectable citrus, but this middle is dominated with raw, pissy lavender and the worst sort of medicinal eucalyptus and a bad breathiness, and the musk at the end smells more animalistic. These two scents are night and day, and I much, much rather wear the modern version despite it's simplicity. However, I do really like the tube it originally came in. It's pretty eye catching despite being a literal cardboard tube you'd get from a paper towel roll, heh.
1000001321.jpg
 
I might try to find some cheap vintage bottles of Grey Flannel and Bowling Green in the future and do some comparisons, but after Eau De Grey I find myself hesitate with that plan. That stuff is rough, like, eucalyptus is so hard to play with, they should've just went with spearmint
 
I wanted to like Grey Flannel, but it just smells like rancid soap to me.
Should've let it age. The best two ways to try is a brand new modern formulation bottle and let it sit a while, or pick up a well kept vintage.
 
Been a few weeks, huh? Well i haven't given up. Just taken a little hiatus to deal with work and actually begin DE shaving.

I will return with more reviews and thoughts by tomorrow.

Small side note: Remember that OLD discontinued clone of Polo Green by 4711? Well, maybe you won't since I've mentioned it a few times in other threads so... here's a reminder1000005387.jpg
Put quite a dent in it, which was easy given it's a 50ml splash bottle... anyway, why does this even matter?

Well... some may pick up that I often am on reselling sites and stalk the boards and yesterday, on a random scroll while checking my order status... I saw it. Someone randomly listed a like new, complete in box, FULL 50ml bottle of Men's Classic AFTERSHAVE, and yes THE GREEN ONE, NOT THE YELLOW EDT VERSION. When I tell you I bought it ON THE SPOT, I didn't... I actually sent an offer BUT it was accepted not too long after.

I couldn't believe it! A twofer on a rare vintage! Ugh I can't wait to use both on a shave day and pair it with a good shave soap. I'll review both as well at the same time so look forward to it!
 
Should've let it age. The best two ways to try is a brand new modern formulation bottle and let it sit a while, or pick up a well kept vintage.
I've had a bottle for 8-10 years now that I really wanted to like but it had never pleased me. I don't remember what the "vintage" stuff from my childhood smells like so i can't honestly say I EVER liked it...maybe its just a name from the past. Same with British Stirling and English Leather. Bought some about 10 years ago and they are Meh at best. Admittedly the British Stirling has improved some (or my tolerance for it has) but it still has a tendancy to offend my nose. English leather was never bad, it just never wowed me.
 
I've had a bottle for 8-10 years now that I really wanted to like but it had never pleased me. I don't remember what the "vintage" stuff from my childhood smells like so i can't honestly say I EVER liked it...maybe its just a name from the past. Same with British Stirling and English Leather. Bought some about 10 years ago and they are Meh at best. Admittedly the British Stirling has improved some (or my tolerance for it has) but it still has a tendancy to offend my nose. English leather was never bad, it just never wowed me.
I think you don't like Nutmeg. That note never sat right with me apart from one sole fragrance, and that was because it was in the back behind a wall of notes to give it a slightly powdery aromatic smell.
 
Back
Top