The Shaving Cadre

Welcome to The Shaving Cadre, a forum dedicated to gentlemanly discourse about wet shaving and other topics of common interests. Membership is always free so register today and join in the fun

Announcement Pictures on TSC

To add a little more into the discussion and hopefully be helpful:

- A software like Adobe with a “save for web” option tries to optimize the picture while keeping the PPI (pixels per inch) to about 72ish. There is very little quality loss unless you need to upscale the picture or put it to print, then things get hairy.

- The JPEG format is still a widely acceptable file type for saving your pictures to use on the web. Most decent editors will allow you a range of choice within the JPEG limits (low, medium, high, etc) in regards to file compression.

- Between saving for web, making sure your file is at or near about 72ppi, and having it as a JPEG, your file size will usually end up pretty optimal to minimize the impact on your hosting service bandwidth.

- If you are using original photos, remember to do 3 things:

1) Save the original, unedited file separate from your edited files for later use if needed. This way if something gets totally screwed up, you will be able to reclaim all that your original picture was.

2) When first working on your picture in an editing program, check to see what the native “save as” file type for your software is. Most decent software has its own file type that allows you to edit and save freely, without loss of image quality. However, lower end software may only give you standard options such as JPEG or GIF, if this is the case you should save only after completing your editing. These file types out your image through a much heavier compression and there is data/quality loss with each save, though it may seem minimal to no loss at first.

3) Finally, when the image is finished being edited, use the “save for web” option or more web friendly option talked about above to save the third and final copy of your work, the one we get to see in all it’s glory!

It seems like a complicated process perhaps, but it is very easy to adapt to after a few times doing it. It should help prevent a lot of headaches later.
 
Just another thing to consider. HUGE pet peeve of mine is reading an older thread that has or should I say "had" pics but there's nothing but red x's because the person reorganized there pics at their hosting site. When you did any moving at photobucket pictures after posting it somewhere it removed the pic from the post. I assume that happens with all hosting site pics if people reorganize. That's a downside to using them in my book. Just another thing to consider
 
Personally, I don’t like when people use photo hosts, because I can see their pics at work. All photo hosting sites are blocked. ?
 
Photo hosting sites are blocked at my place of employment also. So I have to either wait until I get home or pull the phone out.
 
I like using Google Photos to store my pictures. If you want to keep the original "high resolution" image you are limited in space but if you agree to have the image compressed/reduced you get unlimited storage. It is possible to pick and choose which pics are kept as high res and which aren't but i don't bother. The photos i take these days have exponentially better resolution than those I took when my kids were little, even the compressed google image is far better than I expect. I don't think Google has the ability to link a photo to the web but it can act as a solid backup for what you host on a site like photobucket or imgur.

I am sure Google has shared my private home pics with the Russians and aliens from Mars, maybe they even used them to train the new crop of AI robots BUT free (no exchange of $) is a good thing.
 
I guess that's where I fail technology wise. I download photos right from Google photos to my computer and upload from there. I never do any editing as I ain't that smart.....hope what I've posted and how is kosher

All good Dave. I've always had some type of photo editor and probably spend WAYYY too much time with cameras and photography but it's a lot of fun. In fact cameras can be an extremely expensive form of RAD you don't want to get ?
 
I like using Google Photos to store my pictures. If you want to keep the original "high resolution" image you are limited in space but if you agree to have the image compressed/reduced you get unlimited storage. It is possible to pick and choose which pics are kept as high res and which aren't but i don't bother. The photos i take these days have exponentially better resolution than those I took when my kids were little, even the compressed google image is far better than I expect. I don't think Google has the ability to link a photo to the web but it can act as a solid backup for what you host on a site like photobucket or imgur.

I am sure Google has shared my private home pics with the Russians and aliens from Mars, maybe they even used them to train the new crop of AI robots BUT free (no exchange of $) is a good thing.

It's the proverbial double edge sword. On the one hand, tech companies like Google make life super convenient but we don't even KNOW all the ways they are tracking us. Just recently I emailed a travel itinerary as an attachment from my work email to my gmail account, then later in the day received a notice that Google Calendar had updated with my hotel stays! That could only happen if they scanned the attachment and mined the info. Now according to Google I could "opt out" of any future such conveniences but the fact it happened at all is a teeny bit unnerving!
 
I am a notorious too big of a file uploader. I normally just take a picture on my phone them upload it without editing.
 
I do that too....
1f633.png
 
Same here with the uploading from my phone. That's the only way I add pictures. For the most part I'm using a work computer for writing up my SOTD and then I edit and add in the pic from my phone. Otherwise I'm typing it on my phone in the first place and just add it directly. The pics I post to this site never make it off my phone.
 
Back
Top