Avatar: Fire and Ash
For those that haven't seen it yet, (it just came out) this past week), the new Avatar is interesting. It's long, I counted the number of times I looked at my watch to see how much longer we had and came up with two. Not bad for a movie which is over 3 hours long. I would say that it's enjoyable, and can be enjoyed as a one off (I haven't seen the 2nd one yet) but was able to follow along more or less without too much problems. If you're vested into the story from the first two movies, you'll likely enjoy this one. It's a fun film with good action sequences. There are a few (smaller) plot holes that may bother the more OCD audience. It's definitely a movie worth seeing on the big screen, as a lot of the spectacle will be lost on a home television w/o the immersive sound structure of a theater. I'm not going to get into any of the plot specifics for the sake of spoiler removal. But there is one plot line that seemed to be cut short at climax of the film. I may be missing some of the context from the 2nd film, granted, but it still seemed like there was a lot more they could have done to resolve that storyline/plot in a different way. I would say out of 5 stars, I would rank it around a 3.25. Barely above average, but enjoyable enough to spend the money to see in the theater once due to the grandeur of the special effects on the big screen. Don't look to it for a riveting storyline...as you can imagine, it's very closely related to the first movie (and likely the 2nd as well)
Just to qualify how I rank things. Anything 4.5 stars and above is something that you would go see in the theaters multiple times, special effects or not. Typically, movies which do not have a large amount of special effects aren't required theater viewing unless it is just a phenomenal piece of cinema. Classics like Gone With the Wind, Citizen Kane, Casablanca, The Godfather I and II, Schindler's List, Gone Girl (I just think this is incredible storytelling and cinematography) etc...would fit into this realm. A special effects heavy movie definitely gives it more "wassa" to see in the theaters due to the spectacle of it.
Examples;
1 star: Mission to Mars (IMHO, one of the worst films ever made and the only movie I've walked out of the theater for)
2 star: Ghost In the Shell (2017 remake w/ Scarlett Johansson) Special effects heavy movie that really didn't capture the audience. Could have been so much more. The Star Wars sequel trilogy falls in here.
3 star: All the Mission Impossible films. Some were great storytelling, some were horrible. But the special effects make them worthy of seeing in the theater for that alone. The scripts aren't really worth the paper they're printed on, however. A lot of re-hashing of plot devices throughout the entire franchise. I would place Episode I from the Star Wars prequel trilogy here. Also, Godfather III.
4 star: The Hobbit trilogy, Episodes II and III from the Star Wars Prequel Trilogy, Leon - the Professional, Starship Troopers, Shawshank Redemption, Good Will Hunting, Gone Girl. MCU movies typically fall in the lower part of this range, but never reach 5 stars.
5 star: Schindler's List, Saving Private Ryan, Forest Gump, Lord of the Rings trilogy, original Star Wars trilogy, Casablanca, Citizen Kane, Interstellar, Inception, The Dark Knight trilogy