About NutritionFacts.org | NutritionFacts.org
Dr. Michael Greger M.D. brings you the latest in health and nutrition related research delivered in easy to understand video segments.
nutritionfacts.org
Not sure the link went to where you intended it to go.About NutritionFacts.org | NutritionFacts.org
Dr. Michael Greger M.D. brings you the latest in health and nutrition related research delivered in easy to understand video segments.nutritionfacts.org
Sorry was on my phone and it didn't do what I wanted:You posted a page, not an article.
Not totally in jest but the title was certainly click bait. The other video he keeps referring to children (who obviously have totally different needs)Got about two minutes into it and had to stop...
If you are a Professional Athlete or competitive CrossFit Athlete then maybe keto isn't for you...Maybe. But if you are the average person trying to get healthy...then consider it if you have certain issues or want to prevent certain issues. I know plenty of people who do CrossFit and are on Keto. I know plenty of weightlifters that build muscle on Keto. I know you are stirring the pot John...and I like new information...even if it does oppose my own views. But this video is disingenuous at best. They show you just parts of studies and they don't show you what the study was made up of. What version of Keto did they test. Was it an animal only study or was it done on people. Long term or short term. Was their idea of keto "if it fits the macros" or was it good quality food. What confounders were listed. WHO PAID FOR THE STUDY!!!! Most of these studies are paid for by either Big Food or Big Pharma...can someone say "conflict of interest?" This is a perfect example of someone showing only data that proves their point. It's hard for me to take it serious.
Sorry John...I know you posted in jest.
Completely agree...I just want opposing views to be honest in their assessment. To say that Keto is bad means that Keto is bad for everyone. The fact of the matter is that Diets that restrict carbohydrates that are actually contributed to a name have been around since the mid 1800s (see Banting Diet). The only reason diets that restrict carbohydrates are controversial today is some REALLY "bad science" that came out of the 40s, 50s, and 60s by a man named Ancel Keys that conducted clinical research that would be considered unethical today. Research that he conducted was found recently (last ten years or so) that actually went against his "original" findings. He didn't have the works published because it didn't fit his hypothesis. I suck at science, but what I do know is that the Scientific Method goes something like this:I do think it is important so hear other views though.
It was a butt lifter not toner....and it was blue.So .... how's the butt toner coming along? What colours did you end up getting?
See...agenda.
That's actually a pretty good explanation of it...I think you could have added.I suck at science, but what I do know is that the Scientific Method goes something like this:
- Make an observation.
- Ask a question.
- Form a hypothesis, or testable explanation.
- Make a prediction based on the hypothesis.
- Test the prediction.
- Use the results to make new hypotheses or predictions.